http://www.tomguilmette.com/wp/my-blog/archives/1723 Cinematographer, Director of Photography, Editor Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:10:50 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 http://www.tomguilmette.com/wp/my-blog/archives/1723/comment-page-1#comment-3321 admin Wed, 27 May 2009 21:34:34 +0000 http://www.tomguilmette.com/wp/?p=1723#comment-3321 @TJ: Thanks TJ. The new version is up. @TJ: Thanks TJ. The new version is up.

]]> http://www.tomguilmette.com/wp/my-blog/archives/1723/comment-page-1#comment-3320 TJ Wed, 27 May 2009 20:42:39 +0000 http://www.tomguilmette.com/wp/?p=1723#comment-3320 To all who are interested: Lets also keep in mind that some bokeh has been added in post to cover my tracks as far as cloning/healing the edges around the subjects and foreground. The DOF was not effected in the shot, but the Bokeh was made "blurrier" using this process. I only wish I had a bit more real estate on the timeline to allow the viewer to notice the subtle moves. In a spot this quick, certain viewers might just see them as stills and not appreciate the effect, being only 45 frames each. To all who are interested:
Lets also keep in mind that some bokeh has been added in post to cover my tracks as far as cloning/healing the edges around the subjects and foreground. The DOF was not effected in the shot, but the Bokeh was made “blurrier” using this process. I only wish I had a bit more real estate on the timeline to allow the viewer to notice the subtle moves. In a spot this quick, certain viewers might just see them as stills and not appreciate the effect, being only 45 frames each.

]]>