|
||||||
Casio EX FC150 Camera – The Poor Man’s High Speed Phantom
A lot of cameras can shoot “time lapse”, but few can shoot “time warp”. That is what the Discovery Channel people like to call it when using digital technology to slow down a high speed event and make the invisible, visible. I purchased a small Casio point and shoot camera to replace my beat up Panasonic Lumix camera. The $228 DMC-ZS3 Lumix is an awesome camera, and I will continue to use it, but it is tricky to frame and dial in the menu since i dropped it out of a window by mistake. The camera still works, but the four story fall to the ground below cracked the LCD.
I was very close to buying an exact replacement when a new camera caught my eye, the Casio EX FC150. The Casio took 10 MP stills, shot 720p video (.AVI files not AVCHD) and it was about the same size. But what really caught my eye was the fact that the “Exilim” FC150 was able to shoot high speed video.
I knew that the Casio EX F1 Camera was able to record at high frame rates, and I was not impressed. The F1 could shoot Hi-Speed video at 300FPS at 512×384. The video resolution was horrible. The F1 did shoot nice 720 60p video (from what I saw on the internet), but the high speed feature was quite lacking. The new FC150 is able to shoot high speed at 480 resolution, that is a first. But do not go any higher than 240 FPS, the quality is terrible after that. What is the point of shooting 1000 frames per second if the picture is the size of a thumb tack? You could never re-size a piece of video shot 224×64 into a 720p time line! But, as I read the specs on the new little Casio camera, I was surprised the see that it is able to record at 120 frames per second in 640×480 resolution. It would be possible to scale this footy to 720p with out the image degrading to the point of distraction. The camera also takes digital stills and has other features that I will not be testing in this blog. I will only be talking about the high speed video feature on the camera.
You must all understand that this camera cripples the resolution of the CMOS sensor when shooting in high speed. The reason for this is processing power, memory space and price tag. If this little camera could shoot 1000 frames per second at HD resolution, it would max out a 2GB card in a matter of seconds and it would cost a lot more than $350! I found that shooting at 120FPS was quite impressive. It is basically standard definition 480p 4:3 video. I set Final Cut to scale the videos 300 percent to work on my 720p timeline. The 240FPS videos had to be scaled to about 360 percent to fit the window. You do see quite a bit of artifacting when scaling this much. You will see it in the video blog below. But this camera is cheap and lets you shoot at high frames rates. No other camera lets you do this except a Red One or a Phantom and both of those are quite expensive. The FC150 also has a great little in-camera video editing feature. If you record a lot of extra stuff before or after the “high speed event” takes place, you can trim the in and out point of the file. This way, you can save space on your memory card and not have extra useless video date inside the camera. The lens on the Casio FC150 was not as wide as the lens on the Panasonic ZS3. The Casio has a 6.4mm lens and the Panny has a ultra wide 4.1mm lens. This is a big deal, because I really like shooting with a wide angle using my little point-and-shoots as “life-documenting cameras”. Often times, I point the camera back at myself to shoot video blogs or other adventures. A few other differences between the cameras is the default video picture profiles. The Lumix is very contrast heavy with deep blacks and bring colors while the Casio is very flat. This flat feature allows you to color grade in post much more easily with the Casio. But the Lumix has a better picture in low light and in auto mode. The Casio seems to struggle with focus and the manual mode is a bit fiddly. I tried to shoot mostly in manual mode, setting the ISO to 100 and shutter to 30, but the Casio camera was still drifting a bit. I will need more time with the camera to figure it all out for sure. There are ways to adjust sharpness, contrast and saturation inside the Casio, but I have not tested that yet. The sound on the two camera (internal mic only) is about the same and quite good when about 2-3 feet away from the sound source. They both record onto SD cards, but the format that the Casio camera uses is .AVI files for video. The Lumix used h.264 AVCHD files which always crashed my Final Cut Pro if not transcoded to Apple pro res. The .AVI files do need to render, but they work much better nativity on the time line (I can scrub in preview). A great use for this high speed pocket camera would be to bring it along to a RED ONE or Phantom site survey. You can learn real quick if a certain lighting source will flicker at high frame rates. Take a look at the video blog below. I have only had this camera for a few days and I have been busy working. I shot this real quick before I headed into Boston to cover a Bruins game. Thanks to all the guys I work with for helping me shoot high speed stuff on my lunch break. Please download the sample files at the bottom of the page and test them out with your computer. If you have any specific questions, please comment below the video. Please download these original .AVI files taken directly off the Casio EX FC150 memory card and uploaded to the server. Have fun with them and see how they work with your NLE. You can also watch this video on Vimeo by clicking here. Below is some footage from a locked down shot of the goalie at the 2010 Beanpot Hockey Championships. All shot at 240 frames per second at the Boston Garden.
13 comments to Casio EX FC150 Camera – The Poor Man’s High Speed Phantom |
||||||
|
Copyright © 2010 Tom Guilmette - All Rights Reserved |
||||||
hey thx man for sharing the files … i definitely will have a test run in my FCP … looking forward to see more details (auto mode, settings & stuff) soon … until then have fun at work at take a break sometime… even a small one counts
greeting from germany
michael
have fun with the files. the 1000fps stuff looks terrible!
well 420 & 1000 fps are not usable in terms of quality … (at all)
120 fps is ok with me as long as you are on a 720p or web project … i have to try a DVD SD version later … cuz i think we found a good way to make a good looking SD-DVD from 1080p HD footage … but had some problems with “cheaper” 720p30 footage within it … so maybe a 720p to SD test later
there u go: i did a lil “INTERCUT” with Casio EX FC150 720p AVI 120fps, Canon XH-A1 1080i50 HDV/ProRes, RED ONE (Mysterium X), DVX100 & Canon 7D
http://www.vimeo.com/9333852
Tom,
Does it do audio in slow motion as well or is that foley sound?
it was foley sound. the camera does not record sound when shooting slow motion. also, one thing i forgot to add is you cannot adjust anything when shooting high speed. the zoom, focus and exposure locks when recording.
i’d been looking at this for a while. i’d checked vimeo and youtube for decent demo videos but no one had one (that I could see) that showed how the slow-mo looked in a 720p timeline. I thought a lot of it was very passable. especially the outdoor stuff where it had plenty of light and no gain further mucking it up when you scale it up.
(side note: i was proof-reading this before i posted it and ‘further mucking’ looks a lot like ‘mother f’ing’…you can edit this out but I thought it was worth noting!)
as usual, great stuff. they should give you one for the demo. i’m sure it’ll result in more than a few sales!
glad i could help. the 120fps footy looks pretty good on a 720p timeline. workable, but not super sharp when blown up full screen. if just using a small window on the web, it cuts fine with HD content.
the silky smooth motion is great and will open the creative door for the indie filmmaker on a tight budget for sure.
Awesome post I just Love it, Keep posting more like this!
How does this camera handle in low light conditions in 720p mode? This looks like something i might just look into. I have a $200 camera that shoots 60fps at WVGA and it looks sweet. I bet 120fps is fantastic to play with.
in 720p mode is works well in low light, but not as good as the panny lumix ZS3.
120FPS in SD is fun to play with.
Some great slow mo shots of the hockey there Tom. My friend got this camera a while ago and it can produce some pretty impressive stuff. He shot some soccer and motor racing with it and it looked great!
I just cant wait for the next generations of these cameras to come out with improved quality, surprised it hasn’t come out yet as the F1 has been out a few years now. I hope the next gen will have 720p 120fps or 240fps in SD at least.
yea, lots of processing power for more resolution at high frames rates. i am not sure what is possible in these small cameras with cmos chips shooting high speed, but one thing for sure the files will be large recording all that information.
hope these cameras do improve.